<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>CG Shortcuts | Cit | Activity</title>
	<link>https://cgshortcuts.net/members/f5ae397b/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://cgshortcuts.net/members/f5ae397b/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Cit.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 22:15:11 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.10</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d6b5e6dbf658992995e4fba782f1491b</guid>
				<title>Cit replied to the discussion Octane or Redshift? in the forum Redshift - Forum</title>
				<link>https://cgshortcuts.net/forums/discussion/octane-or-redshift/#post-30647</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 18:43:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://cgshortcuts.net/forums/discussion/octane-or-redshift/#post-30647"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Octane or Redshift?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>And… what made me switch too was that Redshift is always updated alongside C4D, unlike Octane. For example, displacement doesn’t work with vertex maps in Octane.</p>
<p>However, I love how volumes work in Octane—it&#8217;s a whole different story in Redshift, kind of crazy! It would be amazing if we could combine the best of both render engines.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		